Nothing like starting off your morning by spreading 9/11 truth through the mainstream media! So I was asked by a friend to call in to C-Span this morning to ask a question about the free fall collapse of WTC7, and luckily I made it through! Granted they did cut me off before I finished the whole question, but I got in most of it and made my point. You can listen to my call in the video below. Me and another guy named John--who was also asked to ask a question about 9/11 by the same friend--ask our questions at minute 13:30. I'll have just the segment featuring us up on YouTube at some point. (Note: They refer to me as a republican caller when I'm brought on. For the record, I am most certainly NOT a republican, or any other party for that matter. I didn't say I was. I think they just assumed I was because I'm from Ohio.)
Tuesday, 11 June 2013
The subject of Bilderberg was discussed in the British House of Commons yesterday, where two members dismissed concerns about it while just about everyone else was laughing non stop.
So basically... The Bilderberg conference isn't a "conspiracy" ... It's just a place where public officials meet and engage in "informative" discussions about world affairs privately, off the record and "as individuals" with criminal bankers and globalists to have their ideologies and therefore policies shaped - "a background to my activities" as Clarke put it - thus rendering Parliament a sideshow. Which by the way is exactly what we've been saying it is. But apparently that's not something the public should be concerned about. No-one mentioned the fact that the security was taxpayer funded or that numerous attendees are breaking laws and codes of conduct just by being there.
When he says they never come to any agreement there, what he means is that they never come to any agreement on the specific details. In general though they are all very much in agreement. The minutes to the 1955 conference for example mentioned how participants were divided at the time on the issue of a single European currency. However when it came to the general idea of European unity, they were obviously in agreement.
Contrary Clarke's assertion that there are no conclusions, in 2010, the former NATO secretary general Willy Claes said that conclusions are indeed formed and that Bilderberg attendees are "supposed to use those conclusions in the environment where he has his influence".
But anyway, regardless of what goes on at the meetings themselves, I expect the real shady stuff that goes on there is what the elite attendees talk about over dinner or a game of golf or something.
So basically... The Bilderberg conference isn't a "conspiracy" ... It's just a place where public officials meet and engage in "informative" discussions about world affairs privately, off the record and "as individuals" with criminal bankers and globalists to have their ideologies and therefore policies shaped - "a background to my activities" as Clarke put it - thus rendering Parliament a sideshow. Which by the way is exactly what we've been saying it is. But apparently that's not something the public should be concerned about. No-one mentioned the fact that the security was taxpayer funded or that numerous attendees are breaking laws and codes of conduct just by being there.
When he says they never come to any agreement there, what he means is that they never come to any agreement on the specific details. In general though they are all very much in agreement. The minutes to the 1955 conference for example mentioned how participants were divided at the time on the issue of a single European currency. However when it came to the general idea of European unity, they were obviously in agreement.
Contrary Clarke's assertion that there are no conclusions, in 2010, the former NATO secretary general Willy Claes said that conclusions are indeed formed and that Bilderberg attendees are "supposed to use those conclusions in the environment where he has his influence".
But anyway, regardless of what goes on at the meetings themselves, I expect the real shady stuff that goes on there is what the elite attendees talk about over dinner or a game of golf or something.
Friday, 7 June 2013
5 Conspiracy Theories That Are Shockingly Easy to Debunk
http://www.cracked.com/article_20466_5-conspiracy-theories-that-are-shockingly-easy-to-debunk.html
From #3: "Conspiracy theorists like Rosie O'Donnell like to rattle off statistics like how the towers fell in nine seconds, which just happens to be free-fall speed. But nine seconds is more likely the amount of time that Rosie put into researching the issue..."
*Sigh*. Here we go again. Let's see...
#5 - Straw man - Alleged problems with the 'magic bullet' theory aren't the strongest reason to doubt the mainstream version of the JFK assassination. Although it's worth noting that the magic bullet shot has never been replicated, not even in debunking programs with professional snipers taking numerous shots with the ballistic bodies positioned correctly. See: http://youtu.be/tjcLtPsOML8
#4 - Straw man - It wasn't about forcing Hitler to war with the US, it was about justifying intervention to the American people and using the attack for propaganda purposes. And they did want war with Japan ...
"If ... Japan can be led to commit an overt act of war, so much the better."
#3 - Straw man - We do not claim the twin towers fell at free fall (though it was close for the first few seconds), we say WTC7 fell at free fall ... because it did, even the government admits it did. The biggest issue with the twin towers is how 15 floors were able to piledrive through 95 floors at all without violating Newton's third law.
The other two I don't believe or even care about. Congrats Cracked writers, you have outdone yourselves. Clearly you were the ones who only put nine seconds of research into this - addressing the claims of filmmakers and uninformed people on the internet and ignoring the actual experts and serious researchers that challenge each of these official stories. Like the thousands of Architects, Engineers, Physicists, Metallurgists, Demolition experts and Firefighters that endorse the WTC demolition hypothesis. Stick to writing articles about bad-ass animals. You suck at debunking.
http://www.cracked.com/article_20466_5-conspiracy-theories-that-are-shockingly-easy-to-debunk.html
From #3: "Conspiracy theorists like Rosie O'Donnell like to rattle off statistics like how the towers fell in nine seconds, which just happens to be free-fall speed. But nine seconds is more likely the amount of time that Rosie put into researching the issue..."
#5 - Straw man - Alleged problems with the 'magic bullet' theory aren't the strongest reason to doubt the mainstream version of the JFK assassination. Although it's worth noting that the magic bullet shot has never been replicated, not even in debunking programs with professional snipers taking numerous shots with the ballistic bodies positioned correctly. See: http://youtu.be/tjcLtPsOML8
#4 - Straw man - It wasn't about forcing Hitler to war with the US, it was about justifying intervention to the American people and using the attack for propaganda purposes. And they did want war with Japan ...
"If ... Japan can be led to commit an overt act of war, so much the better."
#3 - Straw man - We do not claim the twin towers fell at free fall (though it was close for the first few seconds), we say WTC7 fell at free fall ... because it did, even the government admits it did. The biggest issue with the twin towers is how 15 floors were able to piledrive through 95 floors at all without violating Newton's third law.
The other two I don't believe or even care about. Congrats Cracked writers, you have outdone yourselves. Clearly you were the ones who only put nine seconds of research into this - addressing the claims of filmmakers and uninformed people on the internet and ignoring the actual experts and serious researchers that challenge each of these official stories. Like the thousands of Architects, Engineers, Physicists, Metallurgists, Demolition experts and Firefighters that endorse the WTC demolition hypothesis. Stick to writing articles about bad-ass animals. You suck at debunking.
Thursday, 6 June 2013
I am happy to announce that my latest article is finally available online! My newest work, titled Debunking the REAL 9/11 Myths: Why Popular Mechanics Can't Face Up to Reality, is a point-by-point refutation of Popular Mechanics' weak arguments regarding the controlled demolition of the three WTC buildings. If you thought Popular Mechanics' updated 2011 book refuted the so-called "conspiracy theories" about 9/11, think again.
Related info:
Debunking 9/11 Myths - Popular Mechanics
The 9/11 Truth Movement has no credentialed experts...
Download Part 1 now at: http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/604-debunking-the-real-911-myths-why-popular-mechanics-cant-face-up-to-reality-part-1.html
Part 2: http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/612-debunking-the-real-911-myths-why-popular-mechanics-cant-face-up-to-reality-part-2.html
Part 3: http://ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/622-debunking-the-real-911-myths-why-popular-mechanics-cant-face-up-to-reality-part-3.html
Part 4: http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/634-debunking-the-real-911-myths.html
Part 5: http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/653-debunking-the-real-911-myths-why-popular-mechanics-cant-face-up-to-reality-part-5-nanothermite-in-the-towers.html
Part 6: http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/668-why-popular-mechanics-cant-face-up-to-reality.html
Part 7: http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/683%20%20-debunking-the-real-911-myths-.html
Part 8: http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/683%20%20-debunking-the-real-911-myths-.html
Part 9: http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/748-debunking-the-real-911-myths-why-popular-mechanics-cant-face-up-to-reality.html
NEW! Part 10: http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/766-debunking-the-real-911-myths-part-10.html
Editor’s note: This is Part 10 of 10 (see Part 9), the conclusion of an extensive report by 9/11 researcher Adam Taylor that exposes the fallacies and flaws in the arguments made by the writers and editors of Popular Mechanics (PM) in the latest edition of Debunking 9/11 Myths. We encourage you to submit your own reviews of the book at Amazon.com and other places where it is sold. (Quotes from PM are shown in red and with page numbers.)(This post will be updated regularly as more parts are uploaded to ae911truth.org)
Related info:
Debunking 9/11 Myths - Popular Mechanics
The 9/11 Truth Movement has no credentialed experts...
Wednesday, 5 June 2013
Mark Basile has tested samples of paint, and found that neither the blue nor red paint chips exhibit any of the thermitic properties that the active red/gray chips demonstrate. Update: He has now also tested a sample of known WTC primer paint. Take a look at the results:
9/11: EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY EXCLUSIVE - AE911Truth.org - Mark Basile Chemical Engineer:
Harrit et al. thanked Basile for his independent discovery of the red/grey chips making the molten iron spheres when heated. The team confirmed Basile´s discovery with further tests that demonstrated that the chips produce the spheres when they ignite at about 430°C. This was a major discovery since normal combustion does not result in reduced iron and iron melts at about 1,538°C, way above the temperature obtainable with conventional combustion. Millette does not challenge these results because his report has no ignition tests at all, and he has not confirmed that he will attempt to publish. Millette has done research for the government, so his involvement in studying these chips should break the taboo and bring attention to this area of research. I am co-authoring a paper that will cover this debate in detail. Update: Version 1.2 is now posted here. It still has some kinks that need worked out, but a much better PDF version is on the way.
Most importantly, unlike the other two studies which have both been accused by many of bias, Basile is going to oversee the testing, but scientists in an independent lab will do the work. They will have no idea that the dust is from the WTC or from 9/11, to ensure absolute and unquestionable objectivity.
Please visit http://markbasile.org for detailed information on the study and the fund raiser that's been set to help with lab costs. We have added a pay pal option that goes directly to Mark Basile, as can be seen by this screen shot of a test donation made by my mother. We did this for anyone that was perhaps weary to donate to a third party collecting the funds.
Harrit et al. state: "To merit consideration, any assertion that a prosaic substance such as paint could match the characteristics we have described would have to be accompanied by empirical demonstration using a sample of the proposed material, including SEM/XEDS and DSC analyses."
But, as suspected, no tested paint chips have ignited and produce molten iron spheres. In case you didn't know, Dr. James Millette's conclusion in his preliminary report, is that the red/gray chips in the 2009 paper by Harrit et al. are an unidentified type of WTC paint. It's new evidence like this that motivated me to raise funds for a new project with Chemical Engineer Mark Basile, who is featured in the new film by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, 9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out.
But, as suspected, no tested paint chips have ignited and produce molten iron spheres. In case you didn't know, Dr. James Millette's conclusion in his preliminary report, is that the red/gray chips in the 2009 paper by Harrit et al. are an unidentified type of WTC paint. It's new evidence like this that motivated me to raise funds for a new project with Chemical Engineer Mark Basile, who is featured in the new film by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, 9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out.
9/11: EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY EXCLUSIVE - AE911Truth.org - Mark Basile Chemical Engineer:
Harrit et al. thanked Basile for his independent discovery of the red/grey chips making the molten iron spheres when heated. The team confirmed Basile´s discovery with further tests that demonstrated that the chips produce the spheres when they ignite at about 430°C. This was a major discovery since normal combustion does not result in reduced iron and iron melts at about 1,538°C, way above the temperature obtainable with conventional combustion. Millette does not challenge these results because his report has no ignition tests at all, and he has not confirmed that he will attempt to publish. Millette has done research for the government, so his involvement in studying these chips should break the taboo and bring attention to this area of research. I am co-authoring a paper that will cover this debate in detail. Update: Version 1.2 is now posted here. It still has some kinks that need worked out, but a much better PDF version is on the way.
Most importantly, unlike the other two studies which have both been accused by many of bias, Basile is going to oversee the testing, but scientists in an independent lab will do the work. They will have no idea that the dust is from the WTC or from 9/11, to ensure absolute and unquestionable objectivity.
Please visit http://markbasile.org for detailed information on the study and the fund raiser that's been set to help with lab costs. We have added a pay pal option that goes directly to Mark Basile, as can be seen by this screen shot of a test donation made by my mother. We did this for anyone that was perhaps weary to donate to a third party collecting the funds.
 |
 |
|
| Hello Kimberly Talboo, This email confirms that you have donated $1.00 USD to mark basile (ebay_laser_mail@charter.net) using PayPal. Donation Details
Recipient information
Thanks, PayPal |
Monday, 3 June 2013
http://www.anoblelie.com - Please support the filmmakers by purchasing the DVD.
The 1995 bombing in Oklahoma City was a direct blow to the heart of America. 168 people were killed, including nineteen children. For those watching the nightly news, Terrorism had come home. For years following the bombing, countless victims' family members, survivors, rescuers, and ordinary Americans, have questioned the official accounts about that fateful day.
Hoping to shed light on answers long ignored and censored, both by prominent media outlets and the U.S. government, A Noble Lie peels back what we thought we knew about the bombing and it's perpetrators. This film exposes information never before examined or brought to the attention of the American public.
A Noble Lie is the culmination of years of research and documentation conducted by independent journalists, scholars, and ordinary citizens. Often risking their personal safety and sanity, they have gathered evidence which threatens to expose the startling reality of what exactly occurred at 9:02 am on April 19, 1995 in Oklahoma City.
Utilizing footage and eyewitness testimony, previously unseen, A Noble Lie will change forever the way you look at the true nature of terrorism.
Confirmed: FBI Got Warning Day Before OKC Bombing
On This Day in History 1995: The U.S. Government Allowed the Oklahoma City Bombing to Happen
Oklahoma City: Tim McVeigh & Dr. Jolyon West - Was he an Army Intelligence Informant?
The 1995 bombing in Oklahoma City was a direct blow to the heart of America. 168 people were killed, including nineteen children. For those watching the nightly news, Terrorism had come home. For years following the bombing, countless victims' family members, survivors, rescuers, and ordinary Americans, have questioned the official accounts about that fateful day.
Hoping to shed light on answers long ignored and censored, both by prominent media outlets and the U.S. government, A Noble Lie peels back what we thought we knew about the bombing and it's perpetrators. This film exposes information never before examined or brought to the attention of the American public.
A Noble Lie is the culmination of years of research and documentation conducted by independent journalists, scholars, and ordinary citizens. Often risking their personal safety and sanity, they have gathered evidence which threatens to expose the startling reality of what exactly occurred at 9:02 am on April 19, 1995 in Oklahoma City.
Utilizing footage and eyewitness testimony, previously unseen, A Noble Lie will change forever the way you look at the true nature of terrorism.
Confirmed: FBI Got Warning Day Before OKC Bombing
On This Day in History 1995: The U.S. Government Allowed the Oklahoma City Bombing to Happen
Oklahoma City: Tim McVeigh & Dr. Jolyon West - Was he an Army Intelligence Informant?
Sunday, 2 June 2013
Published on Jun 2, 2013
9/11 researcher Adam Taylor talks about his latest paper, "Other Collapses in Perspective: An Examination of Steel Structures Collapsing due to Fire and their Relation to the WTC". One by one he goes over each structure cited in his paper, which have been erroneously compared by some to the WTC high-rise destructions, and explains how these structure failures are nothing like what happened to the Twin Towers and Building 7.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
