Showing posts with label WTC7 demolished. Show all posts
Showing posts with label WTC7 demolished. Show all posts
Saturday, 4 February 2012
Tuesday, 1 November 2011
According to dailymail.co.uk and Pat Curly of Screw Loose Change apparently. Some new footage of Building 7 has been released and according to the dailymail article it proves "once and for all that Building 7 was brought down by the intense heat of the blazing World Trade Center - and not explosives, as conspiracy theorists claim." Let's take at look at this for ourselves before taking this article's word for it.
The article contains several stills from the video that apparently show "raging fires" on several of the lower floors.
These sorts of images are actually nothing new, and certainly don't show any fires that were not previously known to the Truth Movement. Although there were undoubtedly fires in the building, it's quite a stretch to say this footage shows the building "consumed by fire."
As we have previously noted on this blog, the appearance of the building being totally engulfed in flames seems to have been caused by smoke from the burning WTC complex clinging to the side of Building 7.
As for the fires being intense on the lower floors, it has been demonstrated that the fires on the floors which supposedly initiated the collapse were apparently burned out before the time of collapse.
So does this new footage "prove once and for all that Building 7 was brought down by the intense heat?" Hardly. The burden of proof is on the debunkers and any other defenders of the official story to provide evidence that the fires were truly as severe as they claim. Even NIST has acknowledged that the fires in Building 7 were nothing special compared to other skyscraper fires that did not cause collapse.
“Footage That Kills 9/11 Conspiracy Theories” Actually Validates Them
The article contains several stills from the video that apparently show "raging fires" on several of the lower floors.
These sorts of images are actually nothing new, and certainly don't show any fires that were not previously known to the Truth Movement. Although there were undoubtedly fires in the building, it's quite a stretch to say this footage shows the building "consumed by fire."
As we have previously noted on this blog, the appearance of the building being totally engulfed in flames seems to have been caused by smoke from the burning WTC complex clinging to the side of Building 7.
As for the fires being intense on the lower floors, it has been demonstrated that the fires on the floors which supposedly initiated the collapse were apparently burned out before the time of collapse.
So does this new footage "prove once and for all that Building 7 was brought down by the intense heat?" Hardly. The burden of proof is on the debunkers and any other defenders of the official story to provide evidence that the fires were truly as severe as they claim. Even NIST has acknowledged that the fires in Building 7 were nothing special compared to other skyscraper fires that did not cause collapse.
“There are more similarities than differences between the uncontrolled fires that burned in WTC 7 and those that occurred in the following buildings: First Interstate Bank Building (1988), One Meridian Plaza Building (1981), One New York Plaza (1970), and WTC 5 (2001).” -NIST WTC7 FAQ
“NIST therefore concluded that the fires in First Interstate Bank and One Meridian Plaza were at least as severe, and probably more severe, than the fires in WTC 7.” -NIST Final Report on Building 7, pg. 341Related Info:
“Footage That Kills 9/11 Conspiracy Theories” Actually Validates Them
Friday, 20 May 2011
Factual back-up for Tony Szamboti's claims:
-1:47 South wall of WTC1 buckling/columns bowing inward
-4:00 Manipulated sagging models
-4:22 NIST stopped at “collapse initiation”
-4:37 Problems with Dr. Bazant’s analysis
-5:58 NIST’s distorted tilt
-6:33 Bazant’s deceleration flaws
-8:46 Verinage demolitions refute arguments
-9:33 Upper section destroyed, therefore can’t crush lower section
-10:07 NIST “unable to provide a full explanation of the total collapse”
-11:02 Exaggerated sagging
-12:43 No explanation for high temperatures
-14:00 NIST misrepresents design loads of the Towers
-15:34 Small amount of steel saved for analysis
-16:36 No explanation for the molten flow from WTC2
-17:50 NIST acknowledges WTC7 free fall
-18:36 NIST’s WTC7 model doesn’t match the videos
-19:40 NIST’s model resembles natural collapse, but not WTC7 collapse
-20:00 NIST’s illogical reasons for dismissing controlled demolition
-21:06 Secret retrofit of the Citibank Tower refutes NIST’s arguments
-22:20 NIST misrepresents WTC7 construction
-23:11 NIST refuses to release data
-24:10 WTC7 sulfidized steel
-25:30 No other steel from WTC7 saved for analysis
-25:55 NIST never looked at any WTC7 steel in their investigation
-26:12 NIST misrepresents fire severity
-26:40 South Tower fire severity
-26:55 John Gross denies molten metal at Ground Zero
-27:57 NIST admits they never tested for explosives
-28:10 Over 100 first responders reported experiencing explosions
-28:52 NIST fails to follow NFPA 921 guidelines
Related Info:
Structural Aspects of Building 7’s Collapse: Why the NIST Report is Non-explanatory by Tony Szamboti
Saturday, 16 April 2011
Structural Aspects of Building 7’s Collapse: Why the NIST Report is Non-explanatory by Tony Szamboti
Submitted by Radical Pragmatist at 911blogger.com.
Related Info:
The Physics of WTC 7
World Trade Center 7: An Engineered Collapse
NIST's Admission of Freefall - Does It Matter?
The Ultimate proof NIST is lying about WTC7
Re: NIST Report on WTC7 debunked and exposed!
Scientists, Scholars, Architects & Engineers respond to NIST
The NIST WTC 7 Report: Bush Science reaches its peak
The NIST Analyses: A Close Look at WTC 7
Comments on the Draft Report NIST NCSTAR 1-9: “Structural Fire Response and Probable Collapse Sequence of World Trade Center Building 7”, issued by NIST August 21st, 2008
Tuesday, 26 October 2010
Looking through the newly released batch of videos from NIST and I found some interesting stuff in the folder "Richard Peskin." I have a edited together bits from four of the clips in that folder where you can hear what sound like explosions (after both towers have fallen), and the videographer (presumably Richard Peskin) saying that he's heard even more.
It has been speculated that the explosive demolition of WTC7 was supposed to be timed with, or shortly after, the fall of the towers. It is possible the explosions on the tape, some occurring at 11am, well after the collapses, are related to this endeavour.
Debunkers will argue that the explosive noises are only associated with the Tower collapses. This is not proven. This evidence leaves open the possibility that these noises may be coming from within building 7. Remember, Barry Jennings, a survivor who had been trapped inside WTC7 stated that there were explosions going on inside WTC7 over an extended period of time and that he was only rescued after the second tower had fallen.
These explosions refute debunker claims that there were no loud explosive-type noises that one could associate with a controlled demolition.
Related Info:
New 9/11 Footage Reveals WTC 7 Explosions
NIST Cumulus Video - Sounds (and Reports) of Explosions
Barry Jennings and Michael Hess - A detailed look
It has been speculated that the explosive demolition of WTC7 was supposed to be timed with, or shortly after, the fall of the towers. It is possible the explosions on the tape, some occurring at 11am, well after the collapses, are related to this endeavour.
Debunkers will argue that the explosive noises are only associated with the Tower collapses. This is not proven. This evidence leaves open the possibility that these noises may be coming from within building 7. Remember, Barry Jennings, a survivor who had been trapped inside WTC7 stated that there were explosions going on inside WTC7 over an extended period of time and that he was only rescued after the second tower had fallen.
These explosions refute debunker claims that there were no loud explosive-type noises that one could associate with a controlled demolition.
Related Info:
New 9/11 Footage Reveals WTC 7 Explosions
NIST Cumulus Video - Sounds (and Reports) of Explosions
Barry Jennings and Michael Hess - A detailed look
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
